Conspiracy- Part 2

Was Leonard Da Vinci involved in leaving coded messages for a secret religious organization?
Although it may seem like a conspiracy, to have so many influencial people involved in an elaborate cover up, there is a possibility that this conspiracy may have occurred.
The church is not free from scandal, and should not be regarded as perfect in any respect. Perhaps its safe to say that the church, like modern society, is degenerate.
There are positive aspects of the church- for a long time, the church provided those unfortunate individuals with a sense of purpose and belonging. The church was place were people could put their trust- their faith as it were- and believe in something that was beyond their own scope. When times were bad, or health, fortune or even faith was whithering, religion provided a foundation of hope for many.
However, it is difficult to believe in an institution that impells to have secrets- An institution that will go by any means necessary to cover up any negative or contradictory evidence that may prove their religion is flawed- No one likes to be flawed
But the truth remains to be seen. Whether reviewing a novel like "The Da Vinici Code" or viewing the film "V for Vendetta," conspiracy is alive and well in the world. Why society has not been made aware, or has chosen to turn a blind eye to the impertinance and impropriatey of the government and the church, is beyond knowledge. The truth is out there. And we, as a society, have not been told everything there is to know. Like all major institutions, the church has secrets, and wishes to retain those secrets to any extreame.
Whatever the result may be, we have been given an opportunity, all of us in the world, to examine those institutions we call sacred and call them to the mat. Demand them to answer the questions of Jesus, Satan and the everlasting unknown that the church skirts around on a continual basis. The truth remains to be found, because we do not have all the facts.
The question bears repeating. Does Dan Brown's novel lend a basis for analysis? Or is he simply attempting to open a can of worms that should be left closed?